Project Stage 2 (Part 4): Testing and Results
Testing the Pass
With the logic in place, I tested the pass using the provided test cases.
1. Extracting the Test Cases
2. Compiling the Test Programs
Then I used the modified GCC, I compiled the test programs:
3. Results
With test case : test-clone-arch-prune. This test involved two functions that were equivalent after optimizations. The expectiation was for the pass to emit the message:
PRUNE: test_function
indicating that the clone could be safely removed.
PRUNE: test_function
And to the test case
NOPRUNE: test_function
Unfortunately, this test did not pass as expected
Challenges
Gimple Variations: The pass misinterpreted minor IR differences (e.g., variable names) as equivalence.
Simplistic Logic: The statement comparison lacked depth, missing subtle differences.
Reflections
Despite the partial success, the project offered valuable insights into GCC’s IR and pipeline. The failure highlighted the need for better comparison strategies, such as deeper operand checks or hash-based function analysis. These lessons will guide future improvements to the pass.
Final Thoughts
Although the Clone-Pruning Analysis Pass was only partially successful, the project provided valuable insights into compiler design and intermediate representation analysis. Debugging the issues has paved the way for future improvements, and I’m eager to refine the pass further. The challenges faced underscored the complexity of real-world compiler development but also highlighted its rewards.
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét